Monday, November 16, 2009

How Kaavya Viswanathan Remembered, Plagiarized and Got Caught



Kaavya Viswanathan



    • Harvard Student
    • Wrote How Opal Metha Got Kissed, Got Wild, and Got a Life at age 17






















Megan McCafferty


  • well-known author of Sloppy Firsts and Second Helpings
  • accused Kaavya Viswanathan of plagiarizing her books


















----> Comparing the Two Books
The Harvard campus newspaper, The Crimson, published an article of 13 passages from Viswanathan's novel and compared them to McCafferty's novels:

Moneypenny was the brainy female character. Yet another example of how every girl had to be one of the other, smart of pretty. I had long resigned myself to category one, and as long as it got me to Harvard, I was happy. Execpt, it hadn't gotten me to Harvard. Clearly, it was time to switch to category two. (excerpt from Viswanathan's novel)
Sabrina was the brainy Angel. Yet another example of how every girl had to be one or the other: Pretty or smart. Guess which one I got. You'll see where it's gotten me. (excerpt from McCafferty's novel)
"When I was in High School, I read and loved the wonderful novels by Megan McCafferty, which spoke to me in a way few other books did." - Kaavya Viswanathan
---> Richard A. Posner's Thought's on this case
"A crative person is apt to have a feeling of belatedness -- a feeling that thought just as creative as his predexessors ha has appeared on the scene too late; the ship has sailed; the niche he might have filled has been filled already" - Richard A. Posner
- Plagiarizing is a lack of creativity
- It is intellectual fraud when someone take ideas from someone else
-Viswanathan at first denied everything, then claimed that the copying was "unconsious" -- that she "internalized" the novels
"ORIGINALITY is dying" -- this idea may seem true in the fact that simple ideas are starting to become scarce and it's difficult for people to create something new
---> Resolution of this case
Viswanathan had to revise her book and republish them without the plagiarized passages


Posner Revisions

Shakespeare and Plagiarism
William Shakespeare is one of the greatest writers in the history of the world. He has contributed countless works of art to the English world. Some of these works have been stamped as being plagiarized though.
The earliest man known to accuse Shakespeare of plagiarizing was Robert Greene. Greene was a well known English author in the 1500's. Even though many did not know who Shakespeare was at this point in his life, Greene was jealous of Shakespeare. Greene decided to write a pamphlet about how he believed Shakespeare was a plagiarist. The name of this pamphlet is Worth of Wit.
One work that could have possibly been plagiarized was Sir Thomas North's translation of Plutarch's life of Marc Antony. Shakespeare's was called Antony and Cleopatra.
If Shakespeare did plagiarize, why was he not taken to court or fined or even thrown in jail. Posner may possibly say it the best.
"The standard reason given for why it is not plagiarism is that in Shakespeare's time, unlike our, creativity was understood to be improvement rather than originality - in other words, creative imagination."

Group-Dustmites